STAR WARS AND HALO FULL
Master Chief has a motion tracker, which would deter sneaking, and I doubt that Vader would be able to deflect a full assault rifle clip, let alone a blast from a spartan laser. The way I see it, if Vader manages to get close, he promptly cuts the Chief to pieces.
On the other hand, Vader has his Lightsaber and the Force. On one hand, the chief is heavily armored and shielded, and excellent with just about any weapon imaginable. It would take several Scorpion tanks to even stand a chance against their bigger walkers. However, in terms of vehicles, the Empire wins. Ground Combat: In terms of Infantry, I’m going to give the edge to the UNSC again, mostly due to the fact that marines don’t usually fall over and die every time they get hit with an energy-based projectile, (Unless you play on Legendary, but that’s beside the point) and also due to the fact that the UNSC seems to have better strategic planning (at least in my opinion). The Empire does have the Death Star up it’s proverbial sleeve though, and would be tough to handle unless it was ganged up on, or blown up from the inside, which I must admit, is a specialty of the Spartan II’s.Īll in all, I’m going to give the edge to the UNSC in space. Both sides have equal capability to travel through hyperspace, so no advantage there. The UNSC also has the advantage of shipboard AI, making the supercomputers of today look like pocket calculators. fighter, The UNSC Longsword is superior to a TIE fighter in offensive and defensive capabilities.
STAR WARS AND HALO MAC
However, I’m uncertain if that shielding would be able to take a MAC blast, let alone a nuke. However, Star destroyers do have the advantage of shielding, greatly increasing defensive capabilities. Ship for ship, a UNSC destroyer has more concentrated firepower than a Star destroyer, especially in terms of explosives.
Just to clarify things, I’m going to explain this in terms of UNSC vs. Not to mention how many variations of lightsabers there are. GET OVER IT.ģ) Lightsabers are simply more manuverable, and more versatile, it is limited on how the energy sword can only swing in a few ways. Don’t argue this point you retarded Halo fans, Halo sucks and it’s a fact. Link for reference of Mandalorian iron: ()Ģ) Lightsabers do not have a limited battery, energy swords do. A key example is known as Mandalorian iron. Infact energy swords are a primative version of lightsabers, because they use plasma, but it is so far behind, it is not even funny.ġ) Lightsabers can cut through almost every single type of metal, except save-for a few lightsaber resistant metals. Lightsabers are not the same as energy swords. Hate to be arguing with someone whom is with my side, but your first comparison is incorrect. > lightsaber throw\>\>\>\>\>\>energysword
"Wookiee Hunt" Episode Guide – The Clone Wars on StarWars.> *Originally posted by **(/forums/3/topics/51911?page=8#posts-2262419):***."Bounty Hunters" Episode Guide – The Clone Wars on ( backup link) (First identified as Halo).LEGO Star Wars: The Resistance Rises – " Rey Strikes Back".LEGO Star Wars: The Resistance Rises – " Hunting for Han".Aftermath: Empire's End audiobook (Mentioned only).Aftermath: Empire's End (Mentioned only).Star Wars: The Clone Wars – " Wookiee Hunt".Star Wars: The Clone Wars – " Bounty Hunters" (First appearance).You can help Wookieepedia by expanding it. For its appearance in " Wookiee Hunt" the design of the Halo was significantly altered most noticeably adding a center section cargo/staging area, pushing back the aft section to allow the landing gear to function as it had in the original, but also more subtle cosmetic changes like thickening the wing pylons, rounding off the nose, adding extra yellow marking and nose art of a pink tooka doll wielding a knife with the Aurebesh words "Nice playing with ya." This article is a stub about a ship or starship.